Your burden of proof is lower.

你的举太简单。

You carry the burden of proof.

而你有举责任。

The burden of proof isn't on me.

举责任不在于我。

I'm the defense. Burden of proof lies with you.

我是辩方 列举据是你的工作。

In weighing these competing claims, the burden of proof must be reasonable.

在权衡这些互相矛盾的主张时，举必须合理。

Nobody has to prove otherwise. The burden of proof's on the prosecution.

从词来看一切非常明显 没有人能明他无罪。

The Florida health spokesperson told me the burden of proof is on scientists to show the vaccines help children.

佛罗里达州卫发言人告诉我，举的责任在于科学家，他们展示疫苗能帮助儿童。

They said the definition of annoying or nuisance behaviour was too wide and the burden of proof too low.

他们称对烦人或讨厌行为的定义过于宽泛，举责任太轻。

So there's been a reversal of the burden of proof in like you have to show that you're not doing bad.

所以举责任已经发了逆转，你必须明你没有做坏事。

But the burden of proof at this point is on Democrats.

但此时举责任在民主党人身上。

Where the burden of proof isn't on the plaintiff.

在那里举不是原告的责任。

Burden of proof on appeal is set so high... - I know.

上诉的举之高 -我知道。

Proving libel is much easier in Britain than in the United States, because there the burden of proof rests with the defendant.

在英国明诽谤比在美国容易得多，因为英国的举责任在于被告。

The SEC decided they had no case, and their burden of proof is lower.

交所没觉得他们有问题，而且他们的举责任也很小。

This leads to a handy rule of thumb: the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.

这导致了一个方便的经验法则：举责任在于提出索赔的人。

The new deal shifts the burden of proof regarding such harm. To avoid penalties, defendants will have to show that it did not happen.

新协议取消了关于这种损害的举责任。为了避免处罚，被告必须明没有发。

If she'd gone to trial, the burden of proof would be on the prosecution, yet her own lawyer told her to take the deal.

如果她坚持庭审，举责任会在原告身上，可连她自己的律师都在劝她签署协议。

If so many answers seem to allude, you cannot throw the burden of proof upon another or expect a man or teacher to prove to you.

如果这么多答案似乎都在暗示，你就不能把明的责任推给别人，也不能指望一个人或老师向你明。

It's quite transformative because in the past, the burden of proof lied with regulators, so they had to prove Facebook or Apple were breaking EU law, that they were undermining competitors.

这是非常大的变革，因为过去举责任在于监管机构，所以他们必须明 Facebook 或苹果违反了欧盟法律，明他们在破坏竞争对手。

So when all the available evidence suggests that humans are causing an increase in global temperatures, the burden of proof has been fulfilled— if you disagree, it becomes your responsibility to prove otherwise.

因此，当所有可用据表明人类正在导致全球气温升高时，举责任就已经完成——如果您不同意，则您有责任明并非如此。