But this becomes tautological, of course.

但也变得同义反复，当然。

Was that tautological? Was it wise? Did Leibniz really say that?

不是同义反复吗？理智吗？莱布尼茨真那？

I mean, it's tautological in some ways.

我的意思是，它在某些方面是同义反复。