Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与为理论,基于“犯罪是
为”这一刑法学中
先验命题,对于不作为
为性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进
合理说明。