So the illocutionary act is what Austin really driving at.

在这个意义上，言语行理论实际上就行事行理论。

But illocutionary act cannot be translated as yanwaizhiyi, since the prefix -il, as we have made clear, means " in, within, " not " not."

过illocutionaryact译成“言外之意”，因这个前缀-il的意思“”，“非”。

This brings up another difference between the illocutionary act and the perlocutionary act, i.e. one is related to the speaker's intention and the other not.

这行事行跟取效行的另一点同，前者与说话人的意图有关，后者与此无关。

In this general theory then, which applies to all sentences, the original performatives are only a special type in which the illocutionary force is made explicit by the performative verb.

在这个概括性更强的理论适用于所有的句子。

The statement " to say is to do" means that when we utter certain utterances, we are actually using language to undertake actions such as " warning, promise, greeting, order, naming, etc." , that is, illocutionary force

“说即做”指当我们说出某种话语时，实际上在用语言进行“警告、承诺、问候、命令、点名等”等动作，即言外之力。