We also have modal auxiliary verbs, commonly called modals or modal verbs.

我们也有态助动词，通常称为态动词。

In English, we do not put two modals together.

英语中，我们不会把两个态动词放一起连用。

Why don't we cover the modal " WOULD" to make requests?

我们为什么不谈谈态动词 WOULD 用做表示求的用法呢？

So, check out those lessons and become more familiar with modals.

查看这些课程吧，以增加对态动词用法的熟悉度。

So you already know I'm sure about superlatives and modals of necessity.

你已经知道「最高级」和「态动词」的重要性。

This question involves the modal “would” along with the main verb “take.”

这个问题包括了态动词“would”和动词“take”。

However, modals do not always connect to exact ideas about present and past time.

然而，态动词并不总是与有关现在和过去的确切概念联系在一起。

When making suggestions, modal verbs can be very useful.

做建议时态动词非常有用。

We generally do not stress function words - words like pronouns, modals, determiners and so on.

我们通常不会重读功能词 —— 像代词、态动词、限定词等等这样的词。

The modal verb is always the same.

态动词形式永远是相同的。

The words " won't" , short for " will not" , and " should" are modals.

单词" won't" （will not的缩写）和" should" 都是态动词。

I tried to teach something about modal verbs.

我试着了他们一些关于态动词的内容。

And this is true for all modal verbs.

所有的态动词都是一样的。

The modal verb in the reply is " might."

回答中的态动词是“might”。

So, it's a pretty useful modal verb!

所以，这是个非常有用的态动词呢！

This structure involves an if-clause and a second clause that involves the modal " should."

这个结构包括一个 if 从句，以及第二个包含态动词 should 的从句。

In rapid speech, modals seem to disappear because they are shortened and often fall on unstressed syllables.

在快速的语速中，态动词似乎消失了，因为它们被‌‌缩读了，并且常常落在非重读音节上。

Look for modal verbs like 'could', 'might' or 'must'.

寻找像“可能”、“也许”或者“一定”这种态动词。

But again, " maybe" is an adverb, not a modal.

但是，" maybe" 是一个副词，不是态词。

But why is " have to" different from other modal verbs?

但是为什么 “have to” 和其他态动词不一样呢？